20150903 PAP conceals material information to prevent being booted out by Singaporeans

Singaporeans have been patiently asking our PAP servants to come clean and not conceal any material information. It appears we have been ‘playing the piano for cows to listen’.

Shortly after GE 2011, PM Lee advised PAP MPs: “For your own protection, every MP should disclose to me, in confidence, your business and professional interests, your present employment and monthly pay, all retainers and fees that you are receiving, and whether your job requires you to get in touch with officers of Government Ministries or statutory boards on behalf of employers or clients.”

In short, voters do not deserve to know all important information about their respective MPs and only one ‘aristocrat’ needs to know. What exactly is PAP trying to conceal from the public?

Questions:
Are PAP MPs serving Singaporeans or PM Lee?
Does PM Lee have any special power to protect MPs?
Do lawmakers in any other country whisper information which should be in the public domain only to their leaders?

Without transparency, citizens do not know if an MP is furthering his own personal/business/professional interest. From all the epic screw ups and eerie silence on important issues in Parliament, it appears PAP MPs are self-serving.

Almost all PAP MPs are either millionaires or multi-millionaires. PM Lee should have been exemplary by declaring his net worth, ie number of properties, bank account balance, etc. Instead, he allows and encourages all PAP MPs to conceal information from the very people they are serving.

Ex PAP MP Michael and his chateau. Does this guy really need to beg to serve citizens when $16,000 is peanuts to him?

Image credit: BT

Besides MPs’ income and directorship, tax dollar and reserves-related information must also be disclosed. Laws which prevent their disclosure must be amended. An example would be the pay package of Temasek and GIC directors.

Although PSD has confirmed that ministers serving as GIC directors do not receive any fees, the government has yet to reply to my query with regard to Temasek directors’ remuneration.

Perhaps PAP’s status is extremely flexible – a servant begging to serve prior to every election but self-promoted to our master when power is in its hands.

The pay package of Temasek’s top management is probably in excess of $100 million. This money belongs, collectively, to all citizens and it is our right to know who gets how many tens of millions. Citizens are therefore not asking PAP any favour to disclose such information.

In 2007, Minister Vivian Balakrishnan had a Parliamentary exchange with Lily Neo over the increase of only a few million dollars to increase in the benefits of about 3000 needy Singaporeans. In contrast to the gargantuan amount of compensation at Temasek for just a few ‘talents’, there has been total silence in Parliament. Why the double standard?

In April this year, Temasek announced its CEO, Ho Ching, would be on “part-time sabbatical leave” for 3 months. Ho has recently extended her leave to 6 months and will be back at Temasek after GE 2015. Whatever “part-time” means, of interest to citizens would be Ho’s remuneration package because the money will be coming from every citizen’s pocket (reserves).

Assuming Ho’s salary package was $25 million last year, will she be receiving $25 million this year despite being on leave for 6 months? How many millions of tax dollars will Ho be paid while she’s on leave?

If PAP feels that the remuneration at Temasek and GIC is justified, it should not be afraid of disclosure.

While PAP-related information is concealed, other information could be selectively disclosed to help PAP score political points.

MND’s Khaw is of the opinion that the contract awarded by WP to FMSS is an “arrangement to reward their supporters and friends” and describes the $3 million contract as “very rich”.

What about PAP town councils? Aren’t their managing agents also in the same business and because they enjoy economies of scale, are likely to be profiteering more obscenely than AHPETC’s agent?

In 2013, Khaw defended the sale of public property to AIM, a $2 PAP company and said the MND “gives the same latitude to all political parties in town council transactions with political affiliates”.

The town council software had cost $24,000,000 and was sold to AIM, a PAP company, for only $140,000. If a $3 million contract is considered “very rich” to Khaw, the AIM transaction should have left him as speechless as TPL. One would suspect it is the PAP which has been more than grossly profiteering, unless Khaw is able to prove otherwise.

PAP ministers live in glass houses and naughty little boy Khaw really shouldn’t be throwing stones. Should Khaw disclose similar information on PAP TC’s managing agents, there will be public outrage and PAP will be sent packing.

Other information which should be in the public domain includes grassroots members who have regular business dealings with the government. One such company is Top Advertising which counts almost all the ministries as its clients as well as a number of government-linked companies.

Link

For a company whose revenues must be in the tens of millions of tax dollars, the names of its directors are not found on its website. Why is PAP doing business with such companies? Isn’t Top Advertising owned by grassroots leader, Calvin Teo, Ass Sec of Kaki Bukit CCC? Perhaps Khaw would like to shed some light on the profit margin of Top Advertising as he did for FMSS. It’s likely he will find this a sadder outcome for Singaporeans.

The PAP should disclose the value and number of contracts awarded to thousands of grassroots members because it involves hundreds of millions of tax dollars and residents’ funds.

There is simply too much information which should have been in the public domain but continues to be concealed by PAP. Chances are all the hidden information will be deeply-embarrassing to PAP and the disclosure will result in PAP being booted out by the people.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in POLITICS. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to 20150903 PAP conceals material information to prevent being booted out by Singaporeans

  1. Joker says:

    This is what our PM calls transparency and people with integrity. Stupid people still believe him and the Pappies. One old man claimed they have not enriched themselves and yet dares not disclose his assets. Own self check own self, what a joke

  2. Wong Kok Loon says:

    1. Infrastructure not ready for huge influx of foreigners, train stoppages, Breakdown of MRT, MRT trains breaking down frequently and packed liked sardines during peak hours

    2. Lack of transparency about how Temasek and GIC are doing

    3. Losing the Singaporean core

    4. AGO report on PA’s grassroots organizations

    5. Not returning the people’s savings as promised, Senior citizens unable to retire because their life savings tied up in CPF

    6. PMETs losing jobs and replaced by foreigners with fake or half-past-six degrees, Difficulty of Locals Finding Good Jobs, Low Wages, PMETs working as taxi drivers and security guards

    7. Shortage of hospital beds and high medical cost

    8. AIM saga

    9. Spending billions to provide scholarships to foreigners, University Space for Locals, Bright students unable to secure a place in University

    10. Signing of CECA

    11. Housing Shortage, Prices of Home

    12. Road Congestions

    13. Elderly and frail have to collect card boards and tin cans, barely earning enough for 3 meals

    14. Every other day somebody commits suicide because of financial problems

  3. lim hang kiat says:

    The single party in power make us suffer, first two child policy then charge us free land at market price,this is crazy. Now casino that make country vibration like hell for many families and for the country, country finance control by only one family we are putting our saving in onebasket.Come for car means we need to pay 500,000 if we have to own car from The time we work till retirement
    What acoustic we are living.Sit down ponder is this the kind of live for us?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s